Former Financial West Group Supervisors


December 10, 2020

Type of alert:

Failure to Supervise  

Two former supervisors at Financial West Group in Los Angeles, California recently consented to bar from association from member firms under the jurisdiction of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) for failing to supervise four registered representatives who engaged in excessive and unsuitable trading in customer accounts.

According to the Letter of Acceptance, Waiver and Consent (AWC) approved by FINRA Department of Enforcement on November 17, 2020, supervisors failed to supervise four representatives who excessively traded and made qualitatively unsuitable trades involving cheap low-cost securities, options, and Non-Traditional Exchange Traded Products (ETPs) in five customer’s accounts. FINRA asserts that the supervisors ignored numerous red flags related this account activity from December 2013 to July 2017, including, but not limited to: 1) the accounts reflecting high annualized turnover rates and excessive trading; 2) in-and-out trading; 3) inverse and/or leveraged ETF positions in the customer accounts for multiple trading sessions; 4) trades involving options and short-term trading in low-cost securities; and 5) being flagged by the Monthly Account Supervision exception report and daily trade blotter. During this time, the Financial West compliance principal approached the supervisors on separate occasions to notify them of these red flags. One of the supervisors, as the OSJ Supervisor, profited $52,432.81.

By failing to supervise these registered representatives, the supervisors violated NASD Rule 3010(a), and FINRA Rules 3110(a), 2360(b)(20), and 2010. By signing the AWCs, the supervisors consented to a bar from associating with any FINRA member firm in any capacity and a $20,000 fine. The OSJ Supervisor also consented $52,432.81 in partial restitution.

The supervisors are currently associated with Western International Securities, Inc. since they left Financial West in 2017. Their FINRA BrokerCheck report shows one customer dispute for one supervisor that alleged unsuitability. The case settled for over $45,000; the requested settlement amount. The OSJ supervisor has two disciplinary disclosures. In 1991, he consented to an AWC for a violation related to net capital and consented to a censure and $5,000 fine between the other respondents. In 1994, he submitted an Offer of Settlement for another net capital-related violation and consented to a six-month suspension and $10,000 fine.

Take the next steps to find out if you have a claim:

Step 1.

Talk to an Experienced Attorney Today

Call and speak to one of our attorneys* for a no-cost consultation to discuss your situation, answer your questions, and help you determine the next steps. This call usually takes about 15 minutes, but we are happy to talk to you as long as you would like!

Step 2.

Quick Review of Your Paperwork

If we think you might have a case, we will need to review a few basic documents. If we determine you have a case, then you will have the option to hire us as your attorneys to pursue it.

Step 3.

Signed Attorney/Client Agreement

If you decide to hire us to pursue your case, we will have you sign an attorney-client agreement so we can begin the process of trying to recover your losses.*

*In the vast majority of cases, our agreement is contingent – meaning you won’t owe us any money unless we recover money for you.

Request a Consultation

This site contains attorney advertising. The attorneys at ChapmanAlbin are licensed to practice law in Ohio and Michigan. Any reference to past cases or successes made herein should not be construed as a guarantee of any future outcome. Each client and each client’s case is unique, and no result or outcome is or can ever be guaranteed. The information provided in this website is offered for general information purposes only; it is not offered as and does not constitute legal advice in any way. // Disclaimer